Resilience, regulation & AI: key takeaways from Third Party Risk Management Europe 2025 

Third-party risk management (TPRM) has moved beyond compliance into a critical pillar of operational resilience, regulatory readiness, and business continuity. That was the resounding message from the Vendor & Third Party Risk Summit Europe, where leaders across financial services, insurance, and banking shared hard-won lessons from implementing DORA, navigating the AI frontier, and preparing for…

Lucy Montague Avatar
TPRM conference speakers

Third-party risk management (TPRM) has moved beyond compliance into a critical pillar of operational resilience, regulatory readiness, and business continuity. That was the resounding message from the Vendor & Third Party Risk Summit Europe, where leaders across financial services, insurance, and banking shared hard-won lessons from implementing DORA, navigating the AI frontier, and preparing for inevitable vendor disruption. 

Here are the standout themes shaping the next chapter of vendor risk in Europe: 

1. AI in third party risk management: reality, hype, and the governance gap 

While just 15% of active TPRM programs are currently using AI, the potential is vast, and so are the risks. AI is already showing promise in areas like risk identification, resilience simulation, and onboarding acceleration. But governance and trust are lagging. 

As one panelist put it:

“AI is becoming more visible in resilience scenario building and enhanced due diligence, but hallucinations and poor data quality could undermine trust before it scales.” 

Key concerns included: 

  • AI-generated vendor responses during due diligence 
  • Lack of mature AI clauses in supplier contracts 
  • Regulatory blind spots around third-party use of generative AI 

The call to action? Build dedicated AI governance into TPRM processes now, before adoption outpaces oversight. 

2. Exit planning: a resilience imperative 

Exit planning is no longer a back-office exercise, it’s a regulatory requirement, a reputational safeguard, and, in many cases, a client expectation. 

Ayesha James former Group Third Party Risk Steward and Head of Operational & Resilience Risk, HSBC, highlighted that exit planning needs to move beyond documentation into tested, operational capabilities. “It’s not just about the process, it’s about the outcome,” she said. “If your exit playbook hasn’t been tested, it’s not worth much.” 

Insights from the panel: 

  • Stressed exits (e.g. denial-of-service or vendor collapse) require a playbook and scenario rehearsal. 
  • Non-stressed exits should be planned early, ideally at onboarding, where vendors are most engaged. 
  • Clear ownership across exit planning in TPRM, operational resilience, and IT remains a key blocker for many. 

3. Scenario testing: turning theory into readiness 

Across sessions, scenario testing emerged as a vital, but underutilized tool for resilience, from cyberattacks to nth-party collapse. 

HSBC’s Ayesha James, encouraged firms to treat scenario testing like a fire drill something to be repeated, automated where possible, and contextualized to real-world risks:

“You’ll only discover your weak points when you run it through, not when you write it down.” 

Key takeaways: 

  • Use simulations to expose interdependencies between vendors and internal systems. 
  • Test both geopolitical and operational disruption scenarios. 
  • Integrate scenario results into board-level reporting to drive awareness and investment. 

4. Automation & tech: from tooling to transformation for Third Party Risk Management 

Manual-heavy third party risk management processes is no longer sustainable. Several speakers stressed the need for connected, automated platforms that bridge third-party oversight with operational resilience and procurement. 

Mihaela Breg, Head of Operational Resilience & Business Transformation at Europe Arab Bank, shared how her team orchestrates resilience and third-party data using one integrated tool: 

“We used to do it in Excel. Now we’re using real-time dashboards that free up our staff to focus on higher-value resilience activities.” 

Takeaways for transformation: 

  • Automate segmentation and nth-party monitoring. 
  • Use tooling to map supplier contributions to critical business processes. 
  • Shift from reactive to predictive risk management using AI and analytics. 

Conclusion 

The evolution of third-party risk is clear: from compliance to critical capability. With DORA setting the pace, AI expanding the playing field, and exit events becoming more likely, the strongest firms will be those that invest now in: 

  • Governance for emerging tech 
  • Proactive resilience testing 
  • Tech-enabled, cross-functional risk orchestration 

As one attendee noted: “You don’t rise to the level of your plan, you fall to the level of your testing.” Third Party Risk Management leaders would be wise to prepare accordingly. 

FAQ

What was the main theme of the Third Party Risk Management Europe 2025 summit?

The summit highlighted how third-party risk management (TPRM) has evolved from a compliance function into a cornerstone of operational resilience, regulatory readiness, and business continuity. Speakers across financial services, insurance, and banking emphasized the need for stronger governance, smarter technology, and proactive resilience testing.

How is AI transforming third-party risk management?

AI is beginning to play a major role in risk identification, resilience simulations, and onboarding efficiency. However, the summit warned that governance hasn’t kept pace. Only around 15% of TPRM programs currently use AI, and gaps remain around:

AI-generated vendor responses and data quality,
The absence of AI clauses in supplier contracts, and
Limited regulatory oversight on third-party AI use.

Experts urged organizations to build AI governance frameworks into TPRM now—before adoption accelerates beyond control.

Why has exit planning become a key resilience priority?

Exit planning has moved from a documentation exercise to a regulatory and reputational imperative. As HSBC’s Ayesha James noted, “If your exit playbook hasn’t been tested, it’s not worth much.”

Summit takeaways included:
Test “stressed exits” like vendor failure or cyberattacks.
Plan “non-stressed exits” early, ideally at onboarding.
Clarify ownership across TPRM, IT, and operational resilience teams.

  • Shein data transfer inquiry: cross-border data risk is back in focus with Ireland’s Data Protection Commission

    Shein data transfer inquiry: cross-border data risk is back in focus with Ireland’s Data Protection Commission

    Key takeaways Ireland’s Data Protection Commission has opened an inquiry into SHEIN Ireland over transfers of EU/EEA personal data to China. The DPC has said transfers to China are now an “important strategic priority,” and the inquiry will examine GDPR principles, transparency obligations, and Chapter V transfer requirements. This messaging makes this far more than…

  • Why GRC platforms need to keep pace with business change

    Why GRC platforms need to keep pace with business change

    A GRC platform should not only reflect how your business worked on day 1. It should reflect how your business works now and into the future. Contracts change. Ownership models shift. Reporting lines move. New teams come into scope. New obligations appear. Historic records still matter, but they should not make live work harder to…

  • EHS, ESG and GRC: why sustainability compliance now belongs at the heart of risk

    EHS, ESG and GRC: why sustainability compliance now belongs at the heart of risk

    How Enhesa and CoreStream GRC GRC help you turn EHS and sustainability pressure into a joined up, defensible GRC program If you want to see how leading organizations are folding EHS and ESG into their core GRC framework, this is the place to start. 1. Integrating Environment, Health & Safety (EHS), Environmental, Social, and Governance…