Unfortunately when regulators want proof, “we have it in someone’s Visio file” is not an answer. 

A global sports betting and gaming group came to CoreStream GRC with an urgent regulatory requirement: they needed to prove they needed an implementation which understood how work actually flowed across jurisdictions and legal entities, and they needed to do it fast.  

This was not a “create some diagrams” project. It was a governance problem. They struggled to show; clear ownership, how risks and controls connect to real processes, and what is being fixed.  

Client profile  

• Industry: Sports betting and gaming 

• Operating footprint: Multiple regulated jurisdictions 

• Operating model: Decentralized, digital-first 

• Legal structure: Complex, multi-entity group 

The problem: what to do if you have an inability to evidence process mapping, ownership and control effectiveness to regulators 

The client was under regulatory pressure to prove how work actually happened across the business. That meant moving beyond static diagrams and fragmented documentation. 

The client needed to; 

• build a comprehensive view of processes across all jurisdictions and legal entities 

• create accountability with clear ownership for risks, controls, and processes 

• visualize linkages between processes, risks, and controls 

• identify gaps and weaknesses 

• demonstrate to the Board and regulators what the current processes are, and what remediation is underway  

What CoreStream GRC delivered (in 14 days) 

CoreStream GRC implemented and delivered a process mapping tool within 2 weeks of contracting so the client could respond to urgent regulatory requirements.  

The solution was built to make process mapping usable at scale: 

• Processes linked to risks and controls and were viewable in both grid view and process maps, so teams can navigate the same truth in the way that works best for them  

• Dynamic process maps that break down into sub-processes, keeping maps simple to navigate while still reflecting the real operational detail  

• Ownership across every component of the RACM (Risk and Control Matrix), so accountability is visible and enforceable  

• Audit trail of changes across all components of the process maps, to meet regulatory expectations for evidence and traceability  

What changed as a result: Real process visibility, real ownership, real assurance 

The outcomes were practical and immediate: 

• reduced administrative burden and increased efficiency in process mapping, helping the client meet regulatory obligations in a short timeframe  

• created a single source of truth for process maps, replacing spreadsheets and Visio sprawl  

• established ownership across the process maps so individuals are accountable  

• delivered a scalable, integrated platform that can adapt as needs change  

And because the foundation was solid, the work did not stop at “documentation complete.”  

Following the success of the project, CoreStream GRC is now in discussion with the client to implement additional solutions, including action tracking and audit management as the time to value was so immediate.  

Want to explore our solutions? 

What this implementation proves about speed and scale: rapid deployment only works when governance is built in 

In this case, speed worked because the foundation was right. Process maps were not created as static documentation. They were built with ownership, risk, and controls embedded from day one. That is what made the deployment credible at scale and defensible under scrutiny. 

As one of our clients put it: 

“There are plenty of expensive and complex risk software offerings out there, but we wanted a product that was simple to use and intuitive. We quickly appreciated that the CoreStream GRC product was for us and, importantly, one with the potential and flexibility for our users to grow with.

Added to this has been CoreStream GRC’s service that, from enquiry to implementation, has been faultless.” 

Closing message: single source of truth beats scattered evidence 

When regulators, auditors or senior leadership ask how work actually happens, confidence comes from evidence, not reassurance. 

Teams need a single, reliable view of processes, risks and controls. One that shows ownership, change history, and what is being remediated right now. Without that, even well-run programs struggle to demonstrate control effectiveness when it matters most. 

This is why organizations are moving away from isolated diagrams and manual tracking toward platforms that reflect how governance actually operates across complex footprints. 

If you are being asked to prove process reality, ownership, and control effectiveness across a complex footprint, we should talk. 

CoreStream GRC can help you move from “process maps as documents” to process maps as evidence, fast. 

FAQ for implementation timelines for GRC projects