CoreStream GRC 2.12 Release Notes

Platform Director Overview Release 2.12 introduces several powerful enhancements that strengthen both the analytical capabilities and user experience of the CoreStream GRC platform.At the forefront is our new KPI Table Component, designed to give users a highly flexible and visual way to aggregate and track key metrics across flat or hierarchical data structures. With built-in…

Richard Eddolls Avatar
CoreStream GRC logo against dark blue background and blue and green gradient

Platform Director Overview

Release 2.12 introduces several powerful enhancements that strengthen both the analytical capabilities and user experience of the CoreStream GRC platform.
At the forefront is our new KPI Table Component, designed to give users a highly flexible and visual way to aggregate and track key metrics across flat or hierarchical data structures. With built-in support for trend analysis – whether numeric, arrow-based, or RAG-rated – this component brings a new level of insight to operational dashboards.


Another standout feature is the ability to generate calendar events and meeting invites directly from within the platform. This makes it easier to stay on top of important tasks and deadlines by integrating reminders and meetings into your everyday tools – whether for yourself or across your wider team.


Alongside these, we’ve introduced a range of improvements focused on configurability, performance, and usability – from enhanced Single Sign On (SSO) group assignment rules and more flexible CSV export formatting, to smoother form navigation and validation handling. We’ve also continued our ongoing investment in accessibility, translation support, and audit logging to ensure the platform remains robust, inclusive, and enterprise-ready.
We’re excited about the progress in this release and look forward to seeing how these new features support your goals. As always, we value your feedback and remain committed to continuously evolving the platform to meet your needs.


Rich

About Rich Eddolls

Richard is a co-founder and Chief Product Officer at CoreStream GRC, where he’s redefining the way organizations approach governance, risk, and compliance. With 20 years of experience in business-driven GRC system design and a background at Deloitte, Richard is all about challenging the status quo and delivering technology that actually works. As the visionary behind the CoreStream GRC platform, he’s committed to building solutions that don’t just promise change—but deliver it. Outside of the office, Rich is a golfer, soccer player, and proud husband and father, always looking for the next challenge—whether on the field or at home.

Follow Rich on LinkedIn here.

  • UK Corporate Governance Code

    UK Corporate Governance Code

    What is the UK Corporate Governance Code? The UK Corporate Governance Code is the Financial Reporting Council’s corporate governance framework for listed companies in the UK. It sets out principles and provisions covering board leadership, company purpose, division of responsibilities, board composition, succession, evaluation, audit, risk, internal control, and remuneration. The Financial Reporting Council explains…

  • AI governance

    AI governance

    What is AI governance? AI governance is the system an organization uses to direct, oversee, control, and evidence the way artificial intelligence is developed, bought, deployed, monitored, and used. It covers who can approve AI use, what risks need to be assessed, what data can be used, how outputs are reviewed, how decisions are documented,…

  • The EU delayed its AI Act deadline: what the Digital Omnibus means for AI governance everywhere

    The EU delayed its AI Act deadline: what the Digital Omnibus means for AI governance everywhere

    Key takeaways  Introduction: the AI compliance deadline GRC teams have been racing toward just moved  For eighteen months, “2 August 2026” has been a fixed point on the calendar for compliance, risk and AI governance teams across Europe, and well beyond. This was the date the EU AI Act’s toughest obligations, covering high-risk AI systems, were due to bite: conformity assessments, technical…